Next steps on financial pressures
Dear members of the MIT community,
The Institute is facing significant new financial burdens that are changing the way we must operate. These include an increased tax on our investment returns and a range of steps, current and proposed, that would reduce national funding for research. Together, they pose a lasting challenge for the Institute’s central budget, which we estimate to be on the order of $300 million every year.
After extensive community input and months of consultation, modeling and planning, we write now to share our framework for addressing these financial pressures. To meet the moment, our community has had to rethink longstanding patterns and practices and tap a mix of central and local solutions. Throughout, our priority has been to sustain MIT’s excellence and momentum.
This letter explains our approach in broad strokes. For more detail, we encourage you to attend today’s faculty meeting or the staff forum tomorrow afternoon.
The main levers
To close this budget gap, we have three main levers: increasing revenue, reducing costs and something called “rebalancing.”
Increasing revenue
We will do this in part through an increased emphasis on fundraising for core needs, such as scholarships, fellowships, professorships, building funds and unrestricted resources. Flexible funds like these enable us to support our people and sustain our mission as we start to bear new fiscal burdens.
We are also finding new ways, largely through Open Learning, Professional Education and MIT Sloan, to increase revenue through in-person and online offerings that engage additional learners. We expect these can serve as models for other areas that would like to expand their educational reach in ways that generate new revenues.
Reducing costs
Within the Institute’s central budget, some costs are managed by the central administration and others by individual units. We have made it a priority to reduce costs centrally, which helps reduce the local unit burden.
One important way we’re reducing central costs is through how we handle leases and spaces; because of the rise of more flexible work arrangements since the pandemic, MIT needs less office space than it used to. We are therefore able to achieve considerable savings by not renewing several major leases and consolidating administrative units on campus. Further cost savings will come from the recent decision to forgo merit increases this year for employees earning more than $85,000 (except in the case of promotions).
Still, a substantial part of the overall required savings must come from local administrative and academic units – including our own offices – finding ways to operate more efficiently, as they began to do last spring. As units work to limit their costs, unfortunately some will have to make the painful choice to reduce positions. Such decisions generally reflect changing realities in the life of the Institute, such as shrinking demand for certain services, as well as opportunities to make many aspects of our operations and activities more efficient, including through new staffing arrangements.
“Rebalancing”
This is a technique that departments can use to tap underutilized funding they receive each year because of past gifts. A primary example: Many departments have endowed funds for professorships. Given the extraordinary returns on MIT’s endowment in 2021, incoming funds for a given professorship each year may now exceed the costs of supporting the professor. In many cases, it’s possible, while staying true to the donor’s intentions, to use those extra funds to cover additional costs currently borne by MIT’s central budget; a typical step is to name additional faculty to these endowed chairs. When departments do this kind of “rebalancing,” they are able to cover their current costs while providing direct relief to the central budget.
In terms of timing: Most local units will be communicating their plans in the new year. However, depending on local factors, some actions may come sooner. For instance, the MIT Libraries announced a set of decisions earlier today.
Investing in the future
While we take these necessary steps to close the budget gap, it’s vital that we protect foundational investments in our students, such as undergraduate financial aid and support for graduate students. To ensure the future of our mission, we will also continue to support important new initiatives designed to keep MIT at the forefront. While focusing us firmly on the future, such initiatives also create opportunities for outside collaborations and important new funding streams.
Taken together, the framework we’ve outlined will allow MIT to navigate these rough financial waters while maintaining its famous momentum. But – as the last year has demonstrated – the policy weather could certainly grow worse. We are preparing scenarios for that too.
We are extremely grateful to the entire community for the patience and creative thinking you have brought to this process so far, and we will strive to keep you informed and engaged as it unfolds.
Sincerely,
Sally Kornbluth, President
Anantha P. Chandrakasan, Provost
Melissa Nobles, Chancellor
Glen Shor, Executive Vice President and Treasurer
Ian A. Waitz, Vice President for Research
Ramona Allen, Vice President for Human Resources
Katie Hammer, Vice President for Finance
Mary Ellen Sinkus, Assistant Provost for Finance